Do I need to change my API calls to use AgentLens?

No. AgentLens uses SDK patching, not a proxy. Helicone requires changing your base URL to route through their proxy. AgentLens adds two lines and leaves your OpenAI/Anthropic calls untouched.

Helicone Alternative · No Proxy · Self-hosted

AgentLens vs Helicone
More than a logging proxy.

Helicone routes every LLM call through their proxy to log cost and latency. That's useful — but it doesn't tell you if your output is actually good. AgentLens adds quality scoring, hallucination detection, and agent debugging, without a proxy in your critical path.

Book a Demo See Live Demo →

Quick Comparison

Feature-by-feature

Capability	AgentLens	Helicone
Integration model	SDK patch (2 lines)	Proxy (change base URL)
Proxy in critical path	✓ none	✗ adds hop + failure point
Self-hosted (default)	✓	Cloud-first, self-host option
Auto quality scoring	✓	✗
Hallucination detection	✓	✗
Regression alerts	✓	Manual setup
Cost tracking + budget alerts	✓	✓
Agent waterfall debugger	✓	✗
Prompt experiments / playground	Prompt debugger	✓ mature
GDPR DPA / EU data residency	✓ Team plan+	Not documented
Entry price (managed)	€299 / mo flat	Free tier + usage-based

Based on public Helicone info as of April 2026. Verify at helicone.ai/pricing.

Architecture difference

Proxy vs SDK

This is the biggest practical difference. Helicone sits between your app and OpenAI. AgentLens sits beside it.

# Helicone — change the base URL (every call routed through their proxy)
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://oai.helicone.ai/v1", ...)
 
# AgentLens — SDK patch, your OpenAI calls stay untouched
import agentlens
agentlens.init("https://agentlens.your-company.com")
agentlens.patch_openai()  # fire-and-forget, zero latency added to requests

Why this matters: if Helicone's proxy has an outage, your app's LLM calls fail. If AgentLens has an outage, your LLM calls succeed — you just lose telemetry for that window.

When to choose what

Honest recommendation

Choose Helicone if…

You want cost/latency logging with minimal effort
You're fine with a proxy in your critical path
You want mature prompt experiments & playground
You use the free tier + scale with usage pricing

Choose AgentLens if…

You need quality visibility, not just cost visibility
You don't want a proxy in the hot path
You have GDPR / EU data residency constraints
You debug multi-step agents (waterfall timeline)
You want flat managed pricing

FAQ

Common questions

What's the main difference between Helicone and AgentLens?

Helicone is primarily a proxy that logs LLM calls and tracks cost/latency. AgentLens does the same plus automatic quality scoring, hallucination detection, regression alerts, and agent debugging — and runs self-hosted by default.

Can Helicone run self-hosted?

Helicone offers a self-hosted option but their primary model is cloud-based proxy. AgentLens is self-hosted by default — no proxy required, data stays in your infrastructure.

Do I need to change my API calls?

No. AgentLens uses SDK patching, not a proxy. Helicone requires changing your base URL. AgentLens adds two lines and leaves your OpenAI/Anthropic calls untouched.

Which has better evals?

AgentLens ships quality scoring and hallucination detection out of the box. Helicone focuses on logging, cost, and prompt experiments; evals are less developed.

What about latency impact?

AgentLens adds zero latency (fire-and-forget background shipping). A proxy like Helicone adds one network hop to every LLM call.

AgentLens vs HeliconeMore than a logging proxy.